Daisy Art Gallery

The Social History of Art

Introduction

Our Online Daisy Art Gallery brings short overviews on various topics like this one concerning changing role of art in society

What is art? There are available many elaborate definitions of art, although to put it in simple words: art is a reflection of reality , at the very least. Artists create the art employing the contemporary resources, the technology, the knowledge as well as they do it in the given social, cultural, religious, philosophical, and economic framework. Moreover, art documents what fact-based historical records cannot: how it felt to exist in a particular place at a particular time.

As already mentioned, artworks mirror the reality. Art can be also very conducive at pointing out the areas of reality, which need to be improved or completely changed. If some aspects of reality are not enduarable, then art can be helpful in changing those conditions for the better. In other words, art is often a vehicle for social or political change . It can give voice to those, who are politically or socially oppressed. A painting, film or novel can stimulate emotions in those who encounter it, inspiring them to rally for change.


Changing Role of art in society over time

  • Expectations of society in regard to the artist depend essentially on the function of art at the particular time. A high degree of craftsmanship present in many surviving objects dating back to ancient or prehistoric cultures suggests that specialized art producers must have existed at those times, and that art production therefore had to satisfy specific social function. Furthermore, in societies without writing, visual art served as a means of documentation and as a messenger of religious, social and ideological values. An independent, pure esthetical function of art lay for a long time outside the imaginative horizon of societies.

  • In ancient Greece, too, art had to serve to certain ends without a clear agreement on its effects on the broader society. For instance, Plato was against the ideal state of art related to its plain visual context, while Aristotle allowed art at least a pedagogical function in the esthetical education of the people. Judaism and early Christianity reluctantly tolerated the arts that mirrored nature and both religions were also admitting that art could be instrumental with illiterate people. Islam tolerated an ornamental role of art but forbade figurative and narrative contents.

  • The art followed the purposes of the religion for a very long time and was with it narrowly tied up to the 18th century. Only when influence of religion on art diminished, its content could be determined by true subject-matter. Very often the interests and intentions of the ruling institutions (such as the Church, the monarchy or the State), and sometimes the competitive relations between them, were reflected in the subject-matter of art. A “free” art as we perceive it today, could arise only in societies in which art was liberated from its referential, socio-pedagogical and canonizing function. In Europe this happened in the 15th century with ascending importance of science with its empirical and experimental basis. Since then the “free” art mainly in Western World has been following its independent and explorative path taking an advantage of new material development, broadening media options as well as scientific function of discovery and inventions.